Stim Morane: Hi Solo!
Stim Morane: I wonder if I can get my
avatar to stop brushing his head ...
Solobill Laville: Does that only happen
when you sit there?
Stim Morane: Hi Eliza
Eliza Madrigal: Hi there :)
Stim Morane: No, it's an autonomic
function. :)
Solobill Laville: Hi, Eliza! :)
Eliza Madrigal: Hello
Solobill Laville: ok, try this....
Solobill Laville is looking
Stim Morane: We'll start in a minute
...
Solobill Laville gave you Stop All
Animations Lyr (WEAR TO STOP DANCING).
Eliza Madrigal: I've been looking
forward to this..can stay the whole time today :) I know SL has been
slow and odd today
Solobill Laville: wear that and see if
that doe the trick
Stim Morane: I'll try it, thanks, Solo
Solobill Laville: yw
Eliza Madrigal: Hi Pila, Bleu
Solobill Laville: Heya, Pila :)
Bleu Oleander: hi
Pila Mulligan: hi everyone
Pema Pera: Hi Bleu, and hi everybody!
Bleu Oleander: hi Pema
Eliza Madrigal: Hi Pema
Pema Pera: Bleu, I hope we didn't chase
you away yesterday!
Pema Pera: at the Time Workshop!
Bleu Oleander: RL called
Pema Pera: ah, okay!
Stim Morane: Hi Pila, Pema, Bleu,
Eliza, Storm, Scathach
Pema Pera: I was afraid we were too
bottled up in our own corner :-)
Bleu Oleander: the time workshop is
very interesting
Pema Pera: thanks!
Eliza Madrigal: Scathach, Storm,
Fefonz, ~Hello
Bleu Oleander: i'll try to catch it
next week
Scathach Rhiadra: Hello Stim, Solo,
Eliza:)
Pema Pera: we had few people, but next
time we'll get more
Fefonz Quan: Hi all :)
Wol Euler: hello ari, solo
Stim Morane: Hi Fefonz
Pema Pera: great, see you then (too)!
Bleu Oleander: I'm reading Adam Frank's
book and really enjoying it
Stim Morane: Wol
Fefonz Quan: the constant fire bleu?
Pema Pera: Glad to hear that, Bleu!
Solobill Laville: Hi, everyone! :)
Eliza Madrigal: Hi Wol
Wol Euler: hello stim, bleu
Wol Euler: hello eliza
Bleu Oleander: hi
Scathach Rhiadra: Hello Bleu, Ari
Bleu Oleander: hi all
Mickorod Renard: hi everyone
Stim Morane: This is the third meeting
of a new series I'm doing on the nature and role of View in
traditional contemplative practice. One possible point of this
particular series would be to give us all a common ground for some
delicate discussions later, regarding how contemplation might be
understood in the modern, scientifically-informed context.
Pema Pera: (I'll have to leave again in
15 minutes, sad to say, for my RL duties . . . )
Stim Morane: I say "possible
point" because this is all an experiment for me, and I don't
know what is really most suited to SL yet.
Stim Morane: Sure Pema
Stim Morane: So I suggest we go through
my little exercise series one more time, and then discuss
implications for other things.
Stim Morane: Try this---spend about
three minutes (not two this time!) working with the following token
practice and view: breathe normally, and count each exhalation. So
start by counting the first exhalation as "one", and the
second one as "two", etc..
Stim Morane: Frame this practice with
the view that an unfocused, scattered mind lies at the heart of many
of life's problems, and that the practice should be used to help you
learn to control the mind so that it eventually suffers no
distractions and enjoys strict, uninterrupted awareness. Don’t
tolerate gaps. (The “macho” view.)
Stim Morane: If you lose the count, be
aware that that has happened and start again at "one".
Don't cheat! ?
Stim Morane: Count towards a total of
thirty breaths. I'll be the timekeeper, and will stop you at the
three-minute mark.
Stim Morane: Start the little practice
now.
Wester Kiranov is Online
Stim Morane: OK ... that's three
minutes
Stim Morane: :)
Stim Morane: in a previous week, I
mentioned that this was not a spiritual view at all, but a secular
one, and I think we basically agreed re that. Are there any comments?
Stim Morane: I mean, the view that's
control-based, and narrowly goal-directed.
Chloe Paolino: Hello Blue, sorry I am
late.
Stim Morane: Hi Chloe. Welcome. ...
First of all, could you keep the count?
Chloe Paolino: What do you mean?
Stim Morane: Sorry Chloe ... my comment
was directed to the others.
Wol Euler got up to 12.
Eliza Madrigal: At 24 I thought, "is
that 24?"
Stim Morane: Great
Stim Morane: :)
Solobill Laville: yes
Fefonz Quan: slipped at 20 :)
Mickorod Renard: 23
Scathach Rhiadra: got to 18
Stim Morane: I would be that if we took
a bunch of "advanced" western zen sitters and gave them
this exercise, they would lose the count.
Stim Morane: *bet
Stim Morane: So don't be discouraged
Eliza Madrigal: I decided it was and
kept going..but should I have started over?
Stim Morane: Yes, start at 1 again
Eliza Madrigal: K
Stim Morane: There really is a point to
this.
Stim Morane: First of all, we're
deliberately using a narrow view
Stim Morane: one that's very picky and
control oriented
Fefonz Quan: i got an interesting
respond from someone i know about that view exercise
Stim Morane: But aside from that, the
continuity of the count really is important
Stim Morane: Yes Fefonz?
Fefonz Quan: he didn't loose tha count
since he repeated one,one,one,one, then two,two,two, all teh time
Stim Morane: :)
Fefonz Quan: in the head in order to
keep track
Stim Morane: well that's one way to win
Scathach Rhiadra: :)
Stim Morane: but the real point there
is to see the mind
Fefonz Quan: and waste a lot of energy
Stim Morane: the distracted mind
Storm Nordwind: The effect is different
if you start each breath with the count instead of finishing it too
:)
Stim Morane: the low view makes it a
goal, which is ok, but tries to win by beating back all the
distractions.
Stim Morane: That's interesting, Storm.
Say more?
Zen Arado: isn't counting still
thinking?
Storm Nordwind: When you do it at the
end, it feels like to are saying "I've achieved this"
Stim Morane: Yes
Storm Nordwind: When you do it at the
start, it feels like you are giving yourself permission instead
Wol Euler: yes, you're right, it is
different. wow.
Stim Morane: Interesting. So you think
that our current approach increases the likelihood of losing
continuity?
Stim Morane: If so, that's a new angle
...
Stim Morane: Anyway, the point is
really to fail!
Zen Arado: never worked for me - I can
count and think at the same time
Storm Nordwind: I suggest experimenting
between the two
Stim Morane: OK, we will try that
sometime, Storm!
Stim Morane: Anyway, for now I'll just
say the point actually is to fail!
Storm Nordwind: The best success I ever
had was counting to ten, then back to 1 and up again etc
Stim Morane: Because the distractions
are more important than our small victories.
Storm Nordwind nods - sure!
Stim Morane: I see. Yes.
Solobill Laville: That is what I
usually do as well, Storm (1 - 10, 1-10, etc.)
Stim Morane: When I had to go through
this decades ago, the standard was to get to the point where I could
count to 10000 or more wo losing the count
Storm Nordwind: I meant 1-10 then 10-1
then 1-10 Solo
Stim Morane: Oh interesting.
Solobill Laville: (Ah!)
Stim Morane: Anyway, is my comment
about valuing distractions coming through?
Storm Nordwind nods
Stim Morane: On the one hand, we really
should try for continuity.
Stim Morane: On the other, we learn
most by seeing what breaks it.
Stim Morane: And that's where view #2
comes in!
Pema Pera is Offline
Stim Morane: Let's go on to that.
Storm Nordwind is an avatar of very
little brain and big numbers bother him ;)
Solobill Laville: :)
Stim Morane: We'll avoid big numbers
here. I don't like them either
Stim Morane: This time, count the
breath as before, but instead of practicing the sort of mind control
that figured in the first approach, meet all distractions with
compassionate inclusion. So anything that arises within your nature
which seems likely to throw you off or make you lose the count should
be met in a welcoming and inclusive way... and an _appreciative_ way!
Fefonz Quan: infact in 1-10 you just
have to remember one digit, that is easier Solo
Stim Morane: We value the distractions.
Stim Morane: The view here is that
there are no real distractions, only things that we haven't yet
learned to appreciate as actually contributing toward a larger sense
of presence. Practice that way.
Stim Morane: Start with one breath and
maintain continuity for about 3 minutes.
Stim Morane: Start now.
Stim Morane: OK, that's it
Stim Morane: Feel free to stop
counting!
Fefonz Quan goes quietly AFK while
counting... rl...
Wol Euler: :)
Stim Morane: :)
Stim Morane: comments?
Storm Nordwind reached 62 and found it
very much easier
Wol Euler: O.O
Eliza Madrigal: Was it more than 3
minutes? I was at 39...seemed a lot longer
Solobill Laville: I quickly got
catapulted to #3 when I heard the birds...then regrouped, started
couting again
Stim Morane: Yes, i let you go for a
bit.
Stim Morane: this seems like a very
trivial exercise, perhaps
Eliza Madrigal: :) ::whew:::
Stim Morane: But the implications are
potentially huge
Wester Kiranov: i was at 21 + 19 -
weren't we supposed to start again at 21?
Stim Morane: :)
Wol Euler: Nine.
Stim Morane: doesn't matter
Storm Nordwind: Wily Stim
Stim Morane: As I said, the whole point
is to see the mind
Chiaiu Chiung: sorry, must go, bye
everyone
Solobill Laville: hehe
Eliza Madrigal: Bye Chiaiu
Myna Maven: (Bye Chiaiu)
Stim Morane: and to see more of it,
rather than picking and choosing
Solobill Laville: /em waves to Chiaiu
Stim Morane: Bye Chiaiu
Stim Morane: But let me ask you ...
Stim Morane: why does being more open
and accommodating more inclusive counts as being more "spiritual".
Stim Morane: *count
Stim Morane: Why is it "spiritual"?
Stim Morane: Or is it?
Storm Nordwind: Who said it was
spiritual?
Stim Morane: We did ...
Eliza Madrigal: Lighter?
Stim Morane: But I'm questioning that
now.
Stim Morane: Storm, this was in the
first week ...
Storm Nordwind: I had a huge smile on
my face throughout if that counts as spiritual! :)
Stim Morane: But I'd like to raise the
question now what that word really could mean.
Solobill Laville: :)
Stim Morane: Well, there is indeed some
reason to say that spirituality is about being more friendly, more
compassionate and inclusive.
Stim Morane: So the argument can be
made ...
Stim Morane: But I would also like to
encourage you to challenge things here
Stim Morane: Any comments?
Eliza Madrigal: I don't think it *is*
spiritual, but feels perhaps more open and light..which people
associate with spiritual
Stim Morane: Yes
Stim Morane: Others?
Wester Kiranov: i would think
spirituality is about connecting to as much reality as possible
Scathach Rhiadra: feels less
self-centred, again thought of a s'spiriturl'
Stim Morane: The point is a large one
... what is spirituality?
Stim Morane: Yes, Wester, I would
agree.
Storm Nordwind: In that consciousness
it seems as though dealing with others would also be more
compassionate. In many religions that would be seen as spiritual
Stim Morane: But again, being friendly
to distractions and thus to all the facets of mind and nature, could
work in that direction.
Stim Morane: Yes.
Stim Morane: I really do think View #2
is related to spirituality.
Stim Morane: But I also think that
"spirituality" itself is a weird notion.
Stim Morane: There's no exact
counterpart for it in the contemplative traditions we're introducing
Stim Morane: So it's something to
consider.
Stim Morane: We could ask the same
question about view #3 ...
Stim Morane: Why does attending to
"aliveness" count as "spiritual"?
Pila Mulligan: 'highest good' comes to
mind, in relation to spirituality
Stim Morane: And note that Taoists, for
instance, would think it's an important thing.
Stim Morane: Yes, Pila
Stim Morane: I'm uncomfortable with
this notion of "spirituality". It seems to imply a separate
subject or category or aspect of life, and I think that's
unfortunate. But it's hard to say what we should use in place of this
term.
Stim Morane: I would want to talk about
being connected to something that's important, more important than
our usual distractions and preoccupations. And I think the most
important thing we could connect to is simply reality. So
spirituality for me really amounts to a concern with reality. And I
think this is the reason why it might be meaningful to have "science
and contemplation" dialogs in the first place --- they both are
concerned with reality in one sense or another.
Wester Kiranov: there is also this
aspect of learning to see, feel the truth that in some ways you
already know
Stim Morane: Yes, exactly
Stim Morane: It's interesting to note
that the word "spiritual" actually refers to inspiration
and respiration --- to breath. For the ancients, that was about as
real as you can get, and I think they were on the right track.
Pila Mulligan: :)
Stim Morane: It's not so strange to
claim that reality is maximally accommodating or inclusive. Or
"alive". Death comes from looking away from what Is,
disconnecting from it.
Stim Morane: But still, we shouldn't
use the word "spirituality" without some caution.
Stim Morane: Anyway, something to
consider ...
Stim Morane: I wonder whether "science
and contemplation" discussions could proceed without having to
trip over this word
Pila Mulligan: probably not, Stim
Stim Morane: You may be right, Pila.
Stim Morane: But I'll leave that
question open for now ...
Stim Morane: In my classes at the
monastery, I asked people to do the simple "breath-following
plus counting" practice 100,000 times within a one year.. This
was a commitment I urged them to make and keep, the first of several
I suggested over the years. And they did keep this first commitment,
within 12 to 16 months.
Shilv Tigerauge: have to go - rl
Stim Morane: Bye Shilv
Shilv Tigerauge: bye
Mickorod Renard: bye shilv
Stim Morane: One of the things I
noticed at the conclusion of this practice commitment was that some
of them really needed to do the same thing again from the beginning.
And lest that sounds strange, if you were following one of the
traditional contemplative training courses, such as the one that's
typical in Tibetan Buddhism, you would be asked to do much much more
as a prerequisite for any sort of advanced instruction. This is where
the "500,000 preliminary practice repetitions" comes in.
This latter takes far longer than just five courses of counting your
breath 100,000 times, since a typical breath only takes about six or
seven seconds whereas the Tibetan practices each take much longer per
repetition.
Stim Morane: To see the point, take an
example: if people undertake Zen practice, like shikantaza, where
they are being relaxedly and appreciatively present, without some
kind of preliminary training of the sort I'm describing here and that
we've tried in our little exercises recently, been the practice will
actually involve a lot of gaps in awareness ... a lot would be missed
and on more than one level. Being spaced out is not shikantaza.
Stim Morane: *then the practice
Stim Morane: The implications bear on
our own growing appreciation of our own lives and natures, and also
bear on more theoretical discussions.
Stim Morane: In our remaining cafe
meetings, near-term, I would like to collaborate with you all on
which way we should go ...
Stim Morane: towards more re
"practice", or re theory?
Stim Morane: What do you think?
Pila Mulligan: I'd like to aporach
attending to aliveness in both, practice and theroy, Stim
Storm Nordwind: Theory that can be
practised? Practice that can be discussed to see if there's
underlying theory? Both in other words! :)
Wester Kiranov: as far as there is a
difference at all, i think i would prefer practice
Stim Morane: Yes, fair enough, Storm?
Stim Morane: But by theory, I also
meant theoretical discussions such as figure in "science and
contemplation".
Stim Morane: *!
Stim Morane: Do you want more on
practice and theory re your own personaly awakening?
Stim Morane: Or more re "science
and contemplation" in the theoretical sense?
Wol Euler would find that useful
Wol Euler: (practical, taht is)
Stim Morane: OK
Storm Nordwind appreciates the baby
steps we're taking so far.
Stim Morane: These are baby steps. But
they have huge implications, as I mentioned.
Mickorod Renard: anything on personal
awakening
Pila Mulligan: if we can coonect
science and contemplation, it will seem to of necessity be
theroetical, while the awakeneing part cna be both
Stim Morane: Some great masters of the
past just did something like what I've already introduced here.
Stim Morane: Yes, Pila.
Eliza Madrigal: :) Have liked this
Stim Morane: I like to see these two
undertakings as connected.
Pila Mulligan: :)
Stim Morane: But I want to be
responsive to your interests too
Stim Morane: This is really a group
undertaking
Storm Nordwind: The practical stuff
helps us build a vocabulary for the theory it seems
Stim Morane: Yes, right, Storm. And
insight too! Part of the reason for my thinking exercises like these,
Pila Mulligan: science seems to
overlook the awakenieng part of breath that cannot yet be measured
Stim Morane: is that we need to "see"
the mind that does ordinary science-like work.
Stim Morane: True, Pila. It can't
easily get at that.
Stim Morane: ANyway, I'm saying that a
meaning science-spirituality (ugh) dialogue, needs more awareness of
"what kind of mind are we using?"
Stim Morane: *meaningful
Stim Morane: This is one reason for
working w the exercises.
Stim Morane: So my purpose thus far was
just to get grounded.
Stim Morane: ANd we can continue
fine-tuning that.
Wester Kiranov: i think the vocabulary
part is pretty important if we're going to get theoretical. words get
very tricky when you talk about "spiritual" things
Stim Morane: But I'd like input re
preferred directions ...
Stim Morane: Yes, say more Wester?
Wester Kiranov: just think about the
conversation about "spiritual". Or "emptiness"
Stim Morane: Yes, good example
Stim Morane: Remember, in our first,
somewhat failed meeting, I mentioned nirvana as another example
Stim Morane: Even simpler cases like
"values" figure here
Pila Mulligan: oh, and then there is
the big biggy, karma :)
Stim Morane: It's really hard to have a
meaningful discussion without some concrete meaning being assigned to
such notions
Stim Morane: Karma is on the list too,
definitely
Pila Mulligan: :)
Stim Morane: Anyway, you see the issue
we're facing
Stim Morane: For me, without practice
and insight, discussion and argument is meaningless
Stim Morane: Do you agree?
Eliza Madrigal: Yes
Wester Kiranov: yes!
Pila Mulligan: aye
Scathach Rhiadra nods
Wol Euler: mmhmm
Myna Maven: Yes.
Storm Nordwind nods in agreement
Stim Morane: OK, good. So now all we
need is another 10000000 breaths!
Stim Morane: :)
Mickorod Renard: yea
Stim Morane: Or maybe less ...
Stim Morane: This gets us to another,
related issue: practicalities
Stim Morane: In modern society, there
simply is not enough time to do all this traditional training, unless
you find a clever way fitting it into ordinary life.
Stim Morane: *to fit
Stim Morane: So that's another thing
we'll have to work out together.
Stim Morane: You are already dealing
with this in PaB too, of couse.
Stim Morane: *course
Eliza Madrigal: Thank you Stim, must go
:) Bye all
Stim Morane: Bye Eliza
Myna Maven: (Bye Eliza_
Mickorod Renard: bye eliza
Mickorod Renard: yes,,if fast tracking
isnt counter to what we are tryin to acomplish
Stim Morane: So there are several
entwined issues: more direct awareness of our own natures (reality),
the overlap with science, and workaday practicalities issues
Stim Morane: Also, cultural stuff ...
Stim Morane: All of these figure.
Myna Maven: :)
Stim Morane: Where would you like to go
next week? I would be happy to get some suggestions.
Zen Arado: why do you need to bring
science in along with spiritual practice?
Zen Arado: don't quite see the need?
Stim Morane: "spirituality"
may not need it, Zen.
Stim Morane: But it's a possibility.
Stim Morane: I've been studying and
teaching several contemplative traditions for decades.
Zen Arado: I see a danger fo 'science
worship' in our society
Stim Morane: And I have found that
science, as the dominant world-view present, does pop up and even
interfere with people's "practice"
Stim Morane: These two domains are not
entirely separate, however much we might like them to be sometimes.
Stim Morane: And I, in fact, would like
to study overlaps, interfaces. But I know you might not.
Zen Arado: people will only accept
spiritual teachings if they fit in with the findings of science
Stim Morane: It's really up to you.
Zen Arado: science is the final
authority
Stim Morane: Zen, you've brought up an
example of my point.
Pila Mulligan: science can be
associated with attending to aliveness
Deepthinker Oh: Science can never
encompass spirituality
Stim Morane: I'd like to meet that
head-on ... somewhere. But maybe not yet, or not here.
Bleu Oleander: Adam Frank's book may be
a good base for some of these thoughts
Stim Morane: Yes, Deep.
Stim Morane: I agree ... at least for
now.
Stim Morane: OK, well we'll have to
consider our options.
Zen Arado: just a thought
Stim Morane: Yes, Zen. I agree with
you.
Stim Morane: I shouldn't keep you ...
think about your REAL near-term interests, and we'll work out an
approach
Stim Morane: It may take a while ...
Stim Morane: Final thoughts?
Solobill Laville: Just to say thank you
for your time, Stim
Stim Morane: My pleasure ...
Pila Mulligan: yes, thank you Stim
Zen Arado: thank you
Storm Nordwind did not agree with Zen.
But then Storm lives in a less fear-driven society :)
Scathach Rhiadra: yes thank you Stim
Storm Nordwind: Thank you Stim
Mickorod Renard: thankyou stim
Wol Euler: thank you stim.
Wester Kiranov: thank you stim and
everybody else
Stim Morane: Storm, which point are you
referring to?
Myna Maven: Ditto. :) Thank you Stim.
Zen Arado: I am not agaist science
Stim Morane: Thanks, everyone!
Solobill Laville half agreed with Zen!
:)
Zen Arado: it very powerful
Zen Arado: just think we worship it too
much
Stim Morane: Yes
Stim Morane: My concern is the misuse
of science ...
Zen Arado: it is a kind of religion of
its own
Storm Nordwind: I do not see these
dangers around me in Europe. I do not project the US view onto Europe
:)
Stim Morane: misapplication
Stim Morane: I see, Storm. :)
Stim Morane: I run into a certain level
of problemmatical tensions between the two fields just in teaching
meditation to my students.
Wol Euler quietly excuses herself and
heads for bed. 'Night all, take care.
Storm Nordwind: It's just that we do
not have such a fear-ridden culture here.
Solobill Laville: bye, Wol
Zen Arado: thought it was a Western
thing
Myna Maven: Bye Wol.
Storm Nordwind: Ah no Zen
Stim Morane: Perhaps if I explain more,
and give examples, you might find a match in your own culture
Mickorod Renard: I fear that science
has over ran our conciousness,,as a spieces
Mickorod Renard: speices
Stim Morane: OK, well I'm starting to
see a possible point of exploration.
Solobill Laville: :)
Stim Morane: We'll pick this up next
time.
Zen Arado: sure
Stim Morane: Thanks for coming. Please
remember to breathe!
Storm Nordwind chuckles
Scathach Rhiadra: :)
Mickorod Renard: he he he
Zen Arado: I worry about the
'psychologising of Buddhism too
Stim Morane: Yes, another concern I
share.
Zen Arado: thats a good discussion
point I think ?
Stim Morane: But this too is probably a
bigger problem in some countries than others.
Zen Arado: I tand to think that Western
societies think very much alike?
Deepthinker Oh: That is a great topic
the psychologizing of Buddhism
Stim Morane: Just keeping sending me
your thougths, and we'll work out a mutually-interesting workshop
Mickorod Renard: bed time for me
folks,,bye all,,thanks
Zen Arado: but interesting point
Stim Morane: Bye, everyone!
Storm Nordwind must go too. Bye for now
Stim
Scathach Rhiadra: bye Mick
Solobill Laville: OK
Zen Arado: bye
Bleu Oleander: bye
Solobill Laville: Night all
Wester Kiranov: bye
Scathach Rhiadra: bye Stim
Aurora Kitaj: bye everyone
Aurora Kitaj: :)
Myna Maven: Bye all. Enjoyed it. Until
later. :)
Deepthinker Oh: Western people tend to
want to strip out the cultural sapects of buddhism and focus on the
essence
Wester Kiranov is Offline
Aurora Kitaj: sorry i missed the
meeting
Scathach Rhiadra: good night all:)
|